Case Law

Montenegro Case Law: High Court in Podgorica

A collection of court decisions, opinions, and legal positions for legal research. Filter by courts, statuses, decision types, and practice areas. Cross-referenced with legislation and decisions from other instances.

Additional information

Materials in the case law section are prepared using automated data processing algorithms and undergo manual validation. For legally binding actions, we strongly recommend consulting official publication sources.

971 decisions found
Open document

Second-instance civil cases

Payment of rent

Result:Rejected·Left unchanged

Decision under review:P. br. 9001/17
Open document

Second-instance civil cases

Determination of property rights and compensation for damages

Result:Partly granted·Set aside and remanded

Decision under review:P.br. 677/17-13
Open document

Second-instance civil cases

Compensation for damages from employment based on underpaid earnings for overtime work

Result:Rejected·Left unchanged

Subject of review:Law on civil procedure: Art. 379
Decision under review:P. br. 1810/18
Open document

Second-instance civil cases

Compensation for damages from employment for overtime work

Result:Rejected·Left unchanged

Subject of review:Labour law: Art. 77
Decision under review:P.br.1821/18
Open document

Second-instance civil cases

Payment based on out-of-court settlement and apartment rent compensation

Result:Rejected·Left unchanged

Subject of review:Law on obligations: Art. 412, 413, 119
Decision under review:P.br.5835/18
Open document

Second-instance civil cases

Compensation for non-material damage due to injury to reputation and honor

Result:Rejected·Left unchanged

Subject of review:Law on obligations: Art. 207
Decision under review:P.br. 1069/14/14
Open document

Second-instance civil cases

Entrustment of minor children and child support

Result:Partly granted·Modified

Decision under review:P.br.1047/18
Open document

Second-instance civil cases

Damages for construction works performed

Result:Rejected·Left unchanged

Decision under review:P.br.600/18