InVero.me
EN
UKEnglishMontenegroCrnogorskiRussiaРусский
Case no.
Uvp. br. 342/22
Decision date
24.12.2024
Source
Bilten Vrhovnog suda Crne Gore 2024, p. 360
Court
Supreme Court
Area of law
Ownership and Property Rights
Subject of review:Law on restitution of seized property rights and compensation: Art. 3, 2
Applied provision:Law on restitution of seized property rights and compensation: Art. 1, 7

Montenegro · Supreme Court · Bulletin thesis

Bilten Vrhovnog suda Crne Gore 2024, p. 360:Lack of standing in the procedure for restitution and compensation of seized property rights

(Član 3 stav 1 u vezi čl. 2 st. 1 tačka 3 Zakona o povraćaju oduzetih imovinskih prava i obeštećenju)

Bulletin thesis

Lice koje nije zakonski nasljednik bivšeg vlasnika ne može polagati pravo na povraćaj ili obeštećenje.

From the reasoning

"Članom 1 Zakona o povraćaju oduzetih imovinskih prava i obeštećenju ("Sl. list RCG", br. 21/04, 49/07, 60/07, "Sl. list CG", br. 12/07, 73/10, 30/17 i 70/17), na koje se pozivaju sud i upravni organi, propisano je da se ovim zakonom

Full text of the decision

Read case law in full

The full text of decisions and bulletins is available in the Pro plan

Choose a plan

(Presuda Vrhovnog suda Crne Gore, Uvp. br. 342/22 od 24.12.2024. godine)