InVero.me
EN
UKEnglishMontenegroCrnogorskiRussiaРусский
Case no.
Rev. br. 468/22
Decision date
24.01.2024
Source
Bilten Vrhovnog suda Crne Gore 2024, p. 186
Court
Supreme Court
Area of law
Civil Law Relations
Subject of review:Law on obligations: Art. 119, 601, 623, 637
Applied provision:Law on obligations: Art. 611

Montenegro · Supreme Court · Bulletin thesis

Bilten Vrhovnog suda Crne Gore 2024, p. 186:Unfoundedness of the lessee's request for determination that the lease agreement is terminated and the foundedness of the lessor's request for fulfillment of the obligation

(Čl. 119, 601, 623, 637 ZOO)

Bulletin thesis

Zakupac koji se nalazi u posjedu poslovnog prostora po osnovu valjanog ugovora o zakupu ne može jednostranom voljom

From the reasoning

"Postupajući po žalbi tuženog, drugostepeni sud je donio pobijanu presudu kojom je preinačio prvostepenu presudu i odbio kao neosnovan tužbeni zahtjev tužioca, a usvojio protivtužbeni zahtjev tuženog, jer je našao da je prvostepeni sud iz

Full text of the decision

Read case law in full

The full text of decisions and bulletins is available in the Pro plan

Choose a plan

(Presuda Vrhovnog suda Crne Gore, Rev. br. 468/22 od 24.01.2024. godine)