Case law

Case Law of Montenegro

A collection of Montenegrin court decisions for legal research. Filter by court, decision type and area of law, with links to legislation and to decisions of other instances.

Additional information

Platform materials are prepared using automated data processing algorithms and undergo human verification. For legally binding actions, we recommend consulting official state publications.

9984 decisions found
Open document

Revision

Annulment of the decision on termination of the employment contract

Result:Rejected·Left unchanged

Subject of review:: Art. 143
Decision under review:Gž.br.3316/19
Open document

Revision

Determination of discrimination and mobbing and compensation for material and non-material damage

Result:Rejected·Left unchanged

Subject of review:: Art. 8: Art. 2: Art. 14: Art. 1
Decision under review:Gž.br.984/19
Open document

Second-instance civil cases

Payment of rent

Result:Rejected·Left unchanged

Decision under review:P. br. 9001/17
Open document

Revision

Annulment of the decision on termination of employment

Result:Dismissed

Decision under review:Gž.3596/19
Open document

Extraordinary review of a court decision in an administrative dispute

Annulment of the decision on the final amount of old-age pension

Result:Rejected·Left unchanged

Decision under review:U. br. 7489/18
Open document

Revision

Annulment of the decision on termination of the employment contract and compensation for material damage

Result:Rejected·Left unchanged

Subject of review:: Art. 143, 143 b: Art. 7
Decision under review:Gž. br. 5159/19
Open document

Extraordinary review of a court decision in an administrative dispute

Examination of the decision on the introduction of interim administration in a bank

Result:Rejected·Left unchanged

Subject of review:: Art. 123: Art. 17
Decision under review:U. br.8971/18
Open document

Second-instance civil cases

Determination of property rights and compensation for damages

Result:Partly granted·Set aside and remanded

Decision under review:P.br. 677/17-13