InVero.me
EN
UKEnglishMontenegroCrnogorskiRussiaРусский
Case no.
Rev 462/22
Decision date
22.02.2024
Source
Bilten Vrhovnog suda Crne Gore 2024, p. 226
Court
Supreme Court
Area of law
Ownership and Property Rights
Subject of review:Law on seizure of property benefit acquired through criminal activity: Art. 61
Applied provision:Criminal Code of Montenegro: Art. 405, 20, 75Law on seizure of property benefit acquired through criminal activity: Art. 76: Art. 6, 9

Montenegro · Supreme Court · Bulletin thesis

Bilten Vrhovnog suda Crne Gore 2024, p. 226:Unfoundedness of the request for the return of a permanently seized vehicle (Article 61 of the Law on Seizure of Proceeds from Crime)

Bulletin thesis

Trajno oduzeto vozilo koje je bilo upotrijebljeno za izvršenje krivičnog djela postaje državna svojina, te ne postoji

From the reasoning

„Imajući u vidu navedene zakonske odredbe i činjenično utvrđenje da je presudom Osnovnog suda u Nikšiću K. br. 134/18 od 31.05.2018. godine okrivljeni M. S. oglašen krivim za krivično djelo nedozvoljeni prelaz državne granice i

Full text of the decision

Read case law in full

The full text of decisions and bulletins is available in the Pro plan

Choose a plan

(Presuda Vrhovnog suda Crne Gore, Rev 462/22 od 22.02.2024. godine)