InVero.me
EN
UKEnglishMontenegroCrnogorskiRussiaРусский
Case no.
Rev. br. 465/22
Decision date
27.10.2022
Source
Bilten Vrhovnog suda Crne Gore 2022, p. 86
Court
Supreme Court
Area of law
Civil Law Relations
Subject of review:Law on civil procedure: Art. 404, 407
Applied provision:Law on civil procedure: Art. 189, 31, 397

Montenegro · Supreme Court · Bulletin thesis

Bilten Vrhovnog suda Crne Gore 2022, p. 86:Lack of legal interest for filing a revision and inadmissibility of revision against a decision on litigation costs

(Član 404 stav 2 i čl. 407 st. 1 ZPP)

Bulletin thesis

Tužioci nemaju pravni interes da pobijaju drugostepenu odluku u odnosu na dio kojim je odbijen primarni zahtjev, jer se

From the reasoning

“Protiv drugostepene presude, u dijelu izreke pod stavom prvim (odbijajući dio izreke), kojim je odlučeno o primarnom zahtjevu i odluke o troškovima postupka, sadržane u stavu četvrtom izreke drugostepene presude, tužioci su blagovremeno

Full text of the decision

Read case law in full

The full text of decisions and bulletins is available in the Pro plan

Choose a plan

(Rješenje Vrhovnog suda Crne Gore, Rev. br. 465/22 od 27.10.2022. godine)